Writing

Why It Matters

December 3, 2009

in Writing

Why do I spend weeks on a blog post writ­ing and edit­ing it until I pub­lish it?

The answer’s sim­ple: it’s fun to spend time mak­ing some­thing as good as I can make it before I show it to the world. And in a world where dead­lines are the norm, tak­ing the time to craft some­thing until I’m happy with it is a plea­sure. Because it mat­ters to me that this is about cre­at­ing some­thing I can be proud of, and pre­sent­ing that to the world in a way that is good.

The Japan­ese dis­tin­guish between two kinds of qual­ity: atari­mae hin­shitsu – the idea that things work as they should, and miryokuteki hin­shitsu – aes­thetic qual­ity on top of atari­mae hin­shitsu. What I want to do is to write posts that don’t just com­mu­ni­cate, but com­mu­ni­cate beautifully.

The Writer's Ego

September 2, 2009

in Writing

There’s a dif­fer­ence between writ­ing for your­self and writ­ing for your reader, one that’s as clear as night and day.

It’s the dif­fer­ence between what the very smart Kathy Sierra describes as a com­pany that kicks ass, ver­sus a com­pany that helps its users kick ass.

In one, you write to sat­isfy your­self. In the other, you write to sat­isfy your reader.

In one, you read your words with your eyes. In the other, you read your words with your reader’s eyes.

In one, you write stag­ger­ingly works of heart­break­ing genius, and you don’t ever edit dammit because it’s all so mind-numbingly breath­tak­ingly good. In the other, you slay your babies ruth­lessly if they don’t serve your reader.

If you’re writ­ing in ser­vice of your ego (this blog), any­thing goes and your ego’s free to write checks your body can’t cash. But that kind of writ­ing is entirely dif­fer­ent from writ­ing in ser­vice of your reader (my mag­a­zine writ­ing day job), where only what’s 100% use­ful for her gets printed.

As a tech­nol­ogy writer with an over­in­flated opin­ion of him­self, I have to be espe­cially care­ful not to indulge in ver­biage just to stroke my own ego while push­ing my dear reader’s head below the heady waters of infor­ma­tion over­load just one more time because she really needs to know that dig­i­tal cam­era sen­sors only record in black and white, color is added with a over­ly­ing color fil­ter, the most com­mon of which is a Bayer fil­ter.

Why I Love Writing

August 26, 2009

in Writing

Some­one asked me why I love writ­ing, and I couldn’t answer.

Why do some peo­ple like blue­berry pie, a jazz solo or the smell of rain in the evenings? You can find a thou­sand rea­sons why you fall in love, but there’s only one real rea­son: you fall in love because you fall in love.

Warn­ing: The post below assumes you want to get bet­ter at blog­ging. If you’re blog­ging just for fun (hell, I am), this rant is not for you. It also con­tains snarky arro­gance, so don’t read it if you’re not pre­pared to admit how wrong you are and how right I am about every­thing. Namaste.

Forget about sure-fire tips to wild blog­ging suc­cess, there are really only two secrets to be a suc­cess­ful blog­ger and I’ve found them:

1. Write well.

2. Or be a cute and nubile girl who blogs lots of pho­tos of herself.

To every­one else who says you don’t need to write well to be a good blog­ger: that’s bloody stu­pid (cute and nubile girl photo-bloggers excluded). Blog­ging is a writ­ten medium and it is read. To say you don’t need to write well to cre­ate good read­ing is like say­ing you don’t have to cook well to make a good meal. To be good at your art invari­ably demands that you be good at your craft.

And this is art. Not Art with a cap­i­tal ‘A’ that involves a lot of what-the-fuck moments, feigned under­stand­ing and pompous exclu­sion. But art because when it’s done well, it involves cre­ativ­ity, thought, and hope­fully adds to the world of the per­son who’s read­ing it. Not uncon­sid­ered word vomit.

Web 2.0 Doesn’t Kill Good Writing

But Alvin, this is blog­ging! It’s not stodgy old lit­er­a­ture or dusty cob­webbed print jour­nal­ism. It’s Web 2.0 now, gramps, so suck it up and deal.

Yes­ter­day, a friend of mine read an arti­cle I wrote, and said the writ­ing in the arti­cle read like the way I spoke. It sounds like a duh thing to say, but to me, it’s the high­est com­pli­ment pos­si­ble, because for me, it’s the hard­est thing to do.

It takes me a lot of effort to make my writ­ing sound as nat­ural as pos­si­ble with­out sound­ing like a PR drone, to remove as many lay­ers between myself and my reader as I can with as authen­tic a voice as I can muster. To say things not in the way I think I should say them, but in the way I do say them.

A poet is some­body who feels, and who expresses his feel­ings through words. This may sound easy. It isn’t. A lot of peo­ple think or believe or know they feel — but that’s think­ing or believ­ing or know­ing; not feel­ing. And poetry is feel­ing — not know­ing or believ­ing or think­ing. Almost any­body can learn to think or believe or know, but not a sin­gle human being can be taught to feel. Why? Because when­ever you think or believe you know, you’re a lot of other peo­ple: but the moment you feel, you’re nobody-but-yourself.