The 2 Ultimate Secrets to Blogging Like a Rock Star (Hint: it's Not What You Want to Hear)

April 20, 2009

in Blogging,Writing

Warn­ing: The post below assumes you want to get bet­ter at blog­ging. If you’re blog­ging just for fun (hell, I am), this rant is not for you. It also con­tains snarky arro­gance, so don’t read it if you’re not pre­pared to admit how wrong you are and how right I am about every­thing. Namaste.

Forget about sure-fire tips to wild blog­ging suc­cess, there are really only two secrets to be a suc­cess­ful blog­ger and I’ve found them:

1. Write well.

2. Or be a cute and nubile girl who blogs lots of pho­tos of herself.

To every­one else who says you don’t need to write well to be a good blog­ger: that’s bloody stu­pid (cute and nubile girl photo-bloggers excluded). Blog­ging is a writ­ten medium and it is read. To say you don’t need to write well to cre­ate good read­ing is like say­ing you don’t have to cook well to make a good meal. To be good at your art invari­ably demands that you be good at your craft.

And this is art. Not Art with a cap­i­tal ‘A’ that involves a lot of what-the-fuck moments, feigned under­stand­ing and pompous exclu­sion. But art because when it’s done well, it involves cre­ativ­ity, thought, and hope­fully adds to the world of the per­son who’s read­ing it. Not uncon­sid­ered word vomit.

Web 2.0 Doesn’t Kill Good Writing

But Alvin, this is blog­ging! It’s not stodgy old lit­er­a­ture or dusty cob­webbed print jour­nal­ism. It’s Web 2.0 now, gramps, so suck it up and deal.

Well, fuck me. The arrival of blog­ging kills the craft of writ­ing as much as the arrival of MP3s killed the craft of music. Don’t con­fuse the medium for the mes­sage. The fun­da­men­tals of qual­ity work don’t change. A weblog is sim­ply a tech­no­log­i­cal tool that helps you pub­lish your work online eas­ily with­out hard-coding and FTP-ing. Sim­ply put, a blog is an easy-to-use dig­i­tal pen.

Just like a more expen­sive cam­era won’t auto­mat­i­cally make you a bet­ter pho­tog­ra­pher, a new pen won’t auto­mat­i­cally make you a bet­ter writer. Pens don’t write words, peo­ple write words. And you’re stuck with you, no mat­ter which social media is your choice of poison.

As John Gru­ber says so succinctly;

The entire quote-unquote “pro blog­ging” indus­try — which exists as the sort of pim­ply teenage brother to the shirt-and-tie SEO indus­try — is pred­i­cated on the notion that blog­ging is a mean­ing­ful verb. It is not. The verb is writ­ing. The for­mat and medium are new, but the craft is ancient.

This is what pisses me off so much about peo­ple who pro­claim the com­ing of blogs/Facebook/Twitter as the sec­ond, third and fourth com­ing of the Inter­net that will rev­o­lu­tion­ize your life. Does it change your life? Hell yes. Does it make you more com­pelling just because you now have a louder micro­phone? Hell no. The Inter­net is not a magic pill. You’ll become awe­some by becom­ing awe­some, not by press­ing a button.

Or become awe­some by upload­ing lots of pho­tos of your­self (hint: doesn’t work if you’re not cute, nubile and female).

Notice the awesomeness of this blog just explode by five times? Nuff said.

Notice the awe­some­ness of this blog just explode by five times? ‘Nuff said.

What if I’m not Cute & Nubile or I am and I Just Want to be Twice as Awesome?

Write well’ is a blan­ket term that’s easy to say and harder to define. Mer­lin Mann prob­a­bly put it best when he said:

Topic times voice. Or, if you’re a lit­tle bit more of a mav­er­ick, obses­sion times voice. So what does that mean? I think all of the best non­fic­tion that has ever been made comes from the result of some­one who can’t stop think­ing about a cer­tain topic — a very spe­cific aspect of a cer­tain topic in some cases. And sec­ond, they got really good at fig­ur­ing out what they had to say about it.

Topic, inter­est or obses­sion is your thing. What you love is some­thing you find on your own – that’s all you. To write well, ‘voice’ can be bro­ken down into tech­nique and opin­ion. Tech­nique with­out opin­ion leads to stal­e­ness, while opin­ion with­out tech­nique leads to inel­e­gance. Nobody can help you with opin­ion if you don’t have one, but luck­ily there are many sources for technique.

Pick up On Writ­ing Well: The Clas­sic Guide to Writ­ing Non­fic­tion by William K. Zinsser or On Writ­ing by Stephen King. Lis­ten to John Gru­ber & Mer­lin Mann’s Blog­ging Panel at SxSW ’09. Then dive in and do your darnest. Think about what you want to say with each post. Be as orig­i­nal as you can. Try dif­fer­ent ways of arrang­ing your words. Think about how this post adds or doesn’t add to your reader’s life. Let your draft rest for a cou­ple of days before re-reading it again and see what new ideas turn up. Edit and trim your work so you pub­lish a pol­ished piece not a hasty first draft.

You take care of the way you present your­self for an impor­tant date, why not do the same for the words you present to the rest of the world? Good writ­ing is a plea­sure to read, and you want to show the peo­ple who visit your online house a good time, not stick them in the barn and feed them rot­ten cabbage.

I know I sound like an elit­ist arro­gant smart-ass writing-Nazi, but the last thing I want to do is scare any­one away from try­ing a new cre­ative endeavor. Hav­ing worked in cre­ative fields all my life, I know how reward­ing the cre­ative act can be and how daunt­ing it can look like to out­siders – when cre­ativ­ity is really just prac­tice, work, try­ing and falling and try­ing again. Don’t assume you have to be a licensed ‘cre­ative pro­fes­sional’ to be cre­ative, I’ve seen enough of clue­less pro­fes­sion­als and astound­ing ama­teurs’ work to know different.

Yes, it can be really hard at times (and I’ve fallen off the band­wagon so many times), but when you make some­thing you can be proud of, it pays off so many times over. And there’s no bet­ter time to try this than now, when the means to broad­cast your voice to the entire world can be both easy and free with just a Word­Press or Twit­ter sign-up.

And have fun. Because if you’ve never had fun, aren’t hav­ing fun and think you’ll never have fun writ­ing, then blog­ging isn’t the cre­ative medium for you. Thank God there are count­less oth­ers. I can’t dance for fuck but maybe you can.

Good luck and good hunting.

P.S. The last time I wrote a post like this, some help­ful per­son wrote a com­ment about traf­fic. Yes, I know traf­fic, thank you. But all the cute SEO tricks in the world won’t help you if you write badly. And this is the blog where I don’t fuck­ing care.

Related Posts

  1. 3 Elec­tri­fy­ing Secrets™ to a Madly Suc­cess­ful Blog
  2. 9 Keys to Build­ing a Blog You Can Make Tril­lions From
  3. Look­ing Back: 21 Drag­ons’ 2009

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

don May 11, 2009 at 4:19 pm

Well-said Alvin…

Reply

don May 11, 2009 at 4:27 pm

anyway, after taking a degree in comms, and constantly doing academic writing, my writing began to stink….

so in support of ur entry, I would say, ‘If you are good in writing, you’re good. If you stink (like me), you can take up a cert and pray that you will be good!’

But…

Why the name ’21 Dragons’?

I thought it was an online game when i clicked on it….haha

Reply

Alvin May 12, 2009 at 9:48 am

Heya Don, nice to see you here.

The name ’21 Dragons’ doesn’t mean anything really, just a combination of my birthday’s date and a cool mythical beast – something simple and memorable.

I explain it here:

http://21dragons.com/2008/what-does-21-dragons-mean

Reply

don May 13, 2009 at 12:57 am

I realised the difference between my writing and your writing.

Mine is totally bitchin’, complaining and negative. Usually with no solutions, whatsoever.

Yours is critical, yet with facts and suggestions. Your point of view is clearly put across. (I guess being an ex-life coach does help)

Mine is clouded.

Haiz…guess I have a long way to go.

Reply

Alvin May 13, 2009 at 10:23 am

Hey man, thanks for the praise. I’ve been writing non-fiction everyday at work for over two years now, so that’s helped me improve my writing a lot.

Let me put this post in perspective, since a couple of other people seem to like it. The first draft I wrote was so bad I threw it out. It was only a couple of months later, when a few other ideas converged in my head that I managed to start over and write a working draft. I edited that working draft for a good two weeks before I felt I was done with it and published it here.

So it took me more effort than it probably looks :)

If you’re writing just for yourself, then you should write in whatever way you want and in whatever way that works for you – it’s not a test, so don’t sweat it.

Hope that helps.

Reply

Hope October 18, 2010 at 10:14 pm

Alvin thanks so much for that description of the writing process of this article – which I passionately adored – in your reply to a previous comment. The article told me why I need to write well but it’s those little snapshots of behind the scenes that show me how I can do it. Been a tad worried about the time I like to take on a piece. Relieved to see a successful blogger may also take their time.

Reply

Drew February 17, 2012 at 3:53 pm

How is it that I only just stumbled on this blog now? Anyway, I wholeheartedly agree with this post, as I’d wasted a whole lot of time debating with a friend about his blog and his “ideas”. It basically goes: “I don’t need to work on my writing, or my content. I hired an Internet-marketing mentor, and I know all about that stuff now and it’ll make me lots of money soon.”

Writing meaningful content has brought success to writers throughout the years, from Shakespeare to Sorkin. To think it’s no longer necessary is to be a complete idiot.

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: