If you’re wondering about it from my vegetarian posts, no, I haven’t become a vegetarian.
What drew me to explore vegetarian restaurants is what I’ve learned about food these last few months, which made me look for places that serve nutritious and environmentally friendly foods.
This post is about that learning journey, but I want to warn you that it’s slightly over 2000 words long. If you don’t want to go through all that, Mark Bittman summarizes the important points in his much more entertaining TED talk, which will only take you 19 minutes to watch.
Living the Life
It all kick-started for me when a friend introduced me to British chef Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall’s TV show River Cottage. I instantly fell in love with it.
In 1997, Hugh moved from the big city to the countryside for an experiment in self-sufficiency. He learned how to grow his own crops, rear his own animals and every episode he took the best advantage of these beautiful harvests, using his culinary skills to whip up delectable dishes. Here’s a taste of the first episode:
Watching River Cottage made me realize how far removed I was from where my food came from. Whereas Hugh grew and slaughtered his own meat for example, I thought of my meat coming from the supermarket in clear plastic wraps. The sources of my food were intellectual facts in my head, but never something I had experienced firsthand, and it made me interested to learn more about food and where it came from.
In Defense of Food
It was around this time that I finally bought myself a copy of Michael Pollan’s In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto, a book I’d been meaning to read for a while.
Nutrition vs. Nutritionism
Why does anyone need to defend food, of all things? In the book, which grew out of an article Pollan wrote for the New York Times called Unhappy Meals, Pollan argues that mistaking the science of nutritionism – which breaks food down into its chemical constituents – for actual nutrition has its costs.
Pollan, an investigative journalist, found that whole foods behave differently from the nutrients they contain. While fruits and vegetables help to protect against cancer, when the antioxidants are removed from the context of the foods they’re found in to be taken as supplements, they don’t seem to work. In other words, if you find yourself choosing between a vitamin supplement and a salad, eat the salad.
The Perils of the Western Diet
He also wrote about the perils of the Western diet: a diet full of processed foods and meat, fat and sugar. It seems that people who eat a Western diet suffer substantially higher rates of cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity than people eating any number of different traditional diets.
Pollan describes an experiment undertaken by ten middle-aged Aborigines in 1982. Since leaving the bush some years before, they had all developed type 2 diabetes and risks of heart disease. The ten Aborigines returned to their homeland, and were forced to rely exclusively on foods they hunted and gathered for themselves.
After seven weeks in the bush, all had lost weight, blood pressure had dropped and according to Kerin O’Dea, the nutrition scientist who designed the experiment; “all of the metabolic abnormalities of type 2 diabetes were either greatly improved or completely normalized in a group of Aborigines by a relatively short reversion to hunter-gatherer lifestyle.” Since then, a series of comparable experiments with Native Americans and Hawaiians have produced similar results.
In short; lay off the processed foods and meat, fat and sugar, eat as natural as possible and there may be hope for you yet.
So Pollan isn’t defending food as much as he is defending real foods; foods that don’t contain a laundry list of ingredients but are ingredients in themselves, foods that actually grow in nature and our ancestors would recognize, like a potato from the ground versus a potato chip that comes out of a can. The message of the book is simple and summarized on its front cover: Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.
But Not in Defense of White Rice
While reading In Defense of Food, I discovered that not all foods I thought were good for me really are. It turns out that refining grains lengthens their shelf life but removes important nutrients like B vitamins, fiber and iron. And one of the staples of the modern Chinese diet is a refined grain: white rice. We eat it with almost every meal, every single day.
If that wasn’t enough, eating a lot of refined carbohydrates, which include white rice and other refined ‘white’ foods like white bread and white pasta, may increase the risk of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Plus, it turns out that a high carbohydrate diet may also make you fat.
I’d grown up eating white rice almost everyday, and it was as unquestionable a part of my diet as water, but now it turns out to be bad for me? It was unsettling to accept, but I bit the bullet and started cutting down my consumption of white rice to little or none, which earned me questions and curious stares from family and friends. It also made me wonder about how much I thought I knew about food that I still needed to learn more about.
The Problem with Meat
But I did discover a great side-effect from skipping the rice: I had a lot more space in my stomach for fruits, vegetables and meat, glorious meat. Gotta get my protein right? I really enjoyed myself, but then I started thinking about the bigger effects of eating lots of meat.
The Environmental Problem
A 2006 United Nations report called Livestock’s Long Shadow found that “the livestock sector is one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global” and that “livestock are responsible for 18 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, a bigger share than that of transport.”
The problem doesn’t arise from the practice of meat-eating per se, if you grow your own cattle and hunt your own food like Hugh, that’s fine. The problem comes from the modern factory farming system. These factory farms consume enormous amounts of energy and create large amounts of greenhouse gases. When I think greenhouse gas, I usually think of carbon dioxide. But methane, another greenhouse gas, is 20 times more powerful than CO2 at trapping heat in the atmosphere, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency reports that animal agriculture (of cattle, buffalo, sheep, goats, and camels) is the number one source of methane in the world.
The Health Problem
And those are just the environmental effects of meat production. Cattle raised industrially are fed cheap corn (mixed in a feed which may include animal products, it was the feeding of cattle to cattle that caused mad-cow disease), but because their stomachs are meant to digest grass, not grains, they get sick. Which is why as much as 70 percent of antibiotics used in the United States is given to livestock, a practice that leads to the development of bacteria that are immune to many treatments.
Feeding cattle grains also makes their digestive tracts more acidic. Because of this, a strain of acid-resistance E. coli has developed that’s more likely to survive the acid that usually kills it in the human stomach. If you’re an adult, infection can give you severe diarrhea. For children under 5 years of age and the elderly though, it can cause kidney failure and death.
The Ethical Problem
It gets better. The life of an industrially raised animal is not a good one, this is the life of a typically factory farmed chick in 39 days (warning: graphic):
Nearly 280 million laying hens in the United States are confined in cages so restrictive the birds can’t spread their wings. “Broiler” chicken (young male chickens sold when still young) rearing facilities, on the other hand, are extremely overcrowded, with tens of thousands of birds crammed into a single closed broiler house, where the chickens’ excretions pile up and the ammonia fumes burn their eyes, making them blind. The growth of abnormally heavy bodies for more meat causes crippling and deformities, some chickens can’t even walk because their bodies are too heavy, and some simply die of heart failure.
Unfortunately, inhumane treat isn’t just reserved for chickens. Other factory-farmed animals like cattle, ducks and geese, and pigs have it bad too.
This Time it’s Personal
This is the part where I man up to an embarrassing confession.
Like a lot of things, change doesn’t come until there are real costs and benefits attached to it. I started reading about diet back in the late 90s, but it still took me a long time to change.
What really pushed me over the edge this year was how fat I was becoming. If you know me, you’ll probably think I’m going anorexic, but what you may not see on this skinny-fat guy is the extra flab growing on his waistline.
I’ve been trying to lose these love handles ever since I overdosed on food in my 20s, but it never worked. Things came to a head when I gorged myself silly on holiday foods during the end of last year and the beginning of this, and I saw myself fatter than I’d ever been in my holiday photos. This had to end!
The point of this confession? Knowledge about diet is nice, but it’s all in the head. You’ll never get it in the body unless there’s a personal price tag involved.
Making it All Work
We’ve covered many topics about food. Now the question is: how do we pull it all together and make better choices about what to eat?
Books tend to make change sound easy – do this, do that, here’s a 6-step formula. But when I tried to put what I’ve learned into practice, I found that real life isn’t so clear cut.
Real Life is Messy
Having a steak may be healthier for me than a bowl of white rice, but what about the environmental cost of that steak? Organic ingredients at the supermarket are healthier and more environmentally friendly, but what do I do when it can cost two to four times as much as its non-organic equivalent? For that matter, which is less harmful to the environment and healthier for me; a non-organically grown local vegetable or an organically grown vegetable that’s been flown all the way from Japan, eating up fossil fuels for transportation along the way?
How about when the boss buys the office chocolate cake, richly laden with sugar and white flour, and insists I have a slice? What about family gatherings where I don’t get to decide what’s cooking? What do I eat at work, if I have no idea where the meat and vegetables in my cafeteria come from?
And most of the research cited in this article are from the United States. Do we have the same concerns here in South-East Asia? Do our chickens come from local factory farms? Are our cattle fed grass or grain?
These are real questions to a complex problem, and to be honest, I don’t have the answers. In the end, I don’t think there are any easy, one-piece-fits-all solutions, just best choices we each have to make every time we choose something to eat.
Making Sense of it All
I’m neither a doctor nor a nutritionist, so I can’t recommend what you should eat. That also means that I can’t objectively evaluate nutritional findings. And when I try to decipher it, it all seems like one big mess: somebody claims eating this will save you, somebody else says it’s the worst thing ever, and every year a new miraculous super-food arises that will save everyone.
The only sane way I can find out of all this confusion is simply a good dose of common sense. Eat more vegetables and less meat. Makes sense? I think so. A real potato is more nutritious than a processed potato chip. Yup, sounds good. Eat more supplements and skip the real fruits? Maybe not. An organic salad is healthier than a non-organic salad, but a non-organic salad is still healthier than deep-fried chicken? Definitely. Give up ice-cream forever for health’s sake? No way!
Besides common sense, In Defense of Food’s simple manifesto shines through as a useful principle: Eat food (real food, preferably organic, fresh and humanely raised). Not too much (don’t eat till you’re bursting at the seams, it’s not good for you). Mostly plants (think of meat as side-dishes, for your health, the environment and the animal’s sake).
Things have certainly changed from when “what do you want to eat today?” was a much simpler question to answer. When I started learning about food, I never thought that what I chose to eat would not only have nutritional consequences, but also environmental, economical and political as well. I never thought that I would have to think so much about such an essential, and mostly unquestioned, part of my life.
But I like to think that even though I’ve still never slaughtered a chicken personally, I am closer to the source of my food now than I used to be.
Recommended Reading
1. Pollan, Michael. Unhappy Meals. New York Times, January 28, 2007. Link
2. Taubes, Gary. What if It’s All Been a Big Fat Lie? New York Times, July 7 2002. Link
3. Pollan, Michael. The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. Penguin, 2007. Amazon
4. Pollan, Micahel. In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto. Penguin Two, 2009. Amazon
5. Taubes, Gary. Good Calories, Bad Calories: Fats, Carbs, and the Controversial Science of Diet and Health. Anchor, 2008. Amazon
Recommended Watching
1. The Meatrix. Sustainable Table, Free Range Studios, 2003. Link
2. Kenner, Robert, dir. Food Inc. Participant Media, River Road Entertainment, 2008. Trailer | Website | Amazon
3. Spurlock, Morgan, dir. Super Size Me. Kathbur Pictures, Con, The, Studio On Hudson, 2004. Trailer | Amazon



